Wednesday, December 17, 2014

This past Sunday I went to the Illinois Holocaust Museum and Education Center to see Ruth Messinger speak on global civic justice. She was an interesting and thought provoking speaker, although I had a number of issues with what she said, and I suspect with her program more broadly. Ms. Messinger is the head of the American Jewish World Service (AJWS), a not-for-profit dedicated to improving livelihood for the impoverished around the world. The core of her focus was on the importance of humanism and empathy, which is a powerful message.  She clearly cared a lot about effecting positive change in the world, though I found some of her statements/ philosophies complicated her message immensely. To me, the very foundation of AJWS is contradictory. A faith specific organization that preaches total humanism feels hypocritical to me, especially when her rhetoric stems largely from the idea that there is something intrinsic and unique to being Jewish. As a non Jew I do not intend to criticize or demean another religion, but religious belief or not, I find it wrong to distinguish people's quality or character based upon being a part of the same faith. Though she certainly did not criticize other's cultures, the inverse of praising one culture is being derogatory to others.

Despite the issue I had, Ruth clearly does good, important work in countries like Burma, Uganda and Jamaica. Ultimately, I do believe in the mantra of any positive change, and even if I don't agree with her philosophy, I do agree with her actions. From providing small business loans to farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa, to building sewers and latrines in the Caribbean, if her emphasis on a Jewish identity gets more people to give back and support each other, then good for her.  I enjoyed thinking about these issues, and I am interested in going to more public events like this.

1 comment:

  1. Samuel Harrison,

    Sounds like an interesting afternoon! I really enjoy your thoughts on whether it takes away from humanitarian work for an organization to associate itself with religious practices or a specific religious ideology.

    This reminds me of an interesting experience I had a few years back. My freshman year of high school, I helped lead the Homes of Hope trip. Until we got to Mexico, I was completely unaware that the organization we were working with was so deeply rooted in Christianity (to give you an idea, before we started and finishing each house, we all gathered for a communal prayer specifically to Christ). Perhaps I should attribute my reaction to the fact that I don't identify myself as Christian, but the experience was actually off putting. I appreciated the work we were doing less because I felt that it was somehow corrupted by a "missionary-like" purpose. I mean, wouldn’t it seem like a purer act of good will to build houses for the poor without promoting Christianity simultaneously?

    But then again, as you brought up earlier, perhaps I also believe in the mantra of any positive change, and regardless of whether I agree with an organization's religious philosophy, I should be thankful for their good work.

    I really enjoy reading your pieces - keep it up boo man!

    ReplyDelete